amsemp
Director⭐🦐
A 34 year old from two leagues below us and a 29 year old previous NL top scorer from the league above aren’t exactly the same gamble!We took a gamble on Bonne, look how that worked out!!!
A 34 year old from two leagues below us and a 29 year old previous NL top scorer from the league above aren’t exactly the same gamble!We took a gamble on Bonne, look how that worked out!!!
The last time we fast tracked youngsters from loan spells in the Isthmian North to the first team was the likes of Egbri and Acquah and we all know how that went.Not disagreeing, but Kev never seems to have more than 4, hence sending Waldron away on loan when Hopper came in.
Just a thought.... Jack Stone may get an opportunity as the 5th choice.....
You’d imagine there must be some decent prospects in the released lists of a few Premier League academies. KAF was still on the books at West Ham a year ago. Hopefully we keep an eye on U-21s etc.Arsenal have just announce their released list. Maybe we could look at some of the youth players? There must be a gem from the list
He wasn't played as a main striker. He had a great touch, set up goals and defenders certainly knew he was there (except for the play off final where he was admittedly not his best). I think him and Kendall should be kept but Walker and Hopper can be allowed to pursue other opportunities.Why would a full preseason benefit him? A preseason is a preparation for the forthcoming season. Bonne has had a whole season to prove he can’t score goals.
he signed in SeptemberWhy would a full preseason benefit him? A preseason is a preparation for the forthcoming season. Bonne has had a whole season to prove he can’t score goals.
I’d be more inclined to track the ones who drop into non-league at 19 or 20 and see which ones kick on and then pick them up in a year/18 months’ time.You’d imagine there must be some decent prospects in the released lists of a few Premier League academies. KAF was still on the books at West Ham a year ago. Hopefully we keep an eye on U-21s etc.
He wasn't played as a main striker.
Pereira, Shade, Cashman ... yes to all.I've had a think about Goodliffe and now think he will improve and be an asset if we could get him. I also think we should be looking at Louie Annesley, CB from Braintree Town.
i really hope this is a sarcastic suggestionWe love suggesting ex-players on this forum so why not Jimi Gower![]()
Pereira, Shade, Cashman ... yes to all.
Goodliffe gets praise when he had a great game, and he's the worst player ever when he makes a mistake. He shouldn't be written off IMO because of one error. What about the good things he did in the playoff run? Fans forget so quickly. He fits in with the squad and will learn from his mistakes.
I'd take Golding in a heartbeat, but have a feeling that Oxford have plans for him higher up the food chain...Agree. He's definitely made mistakes, but has more than made up for them.
I take it Golding's a no-chance for us, either loan extension or purchase? Not seen him mentioned but have only skimmed through this thread.
It wasn’t just one mistake. In the final he was badly exposed (not necessarily solely at fault) for all three goals plus the chance Fondop chipped wide.Pereira, Shade, Cashman ... yes to all.
Goodliffe gets praise when he had a great game, and he's the worst player ever when he makes a mistake. He shouldn't be written off IMO because of one error. What about the good things he did in the playoff run? Fans forget so quickly. He fits in with the squad and will learn from his mistakes.
Fair and just response.It wasn’t just one mistake. In the final he was badly exposed (not necessarily solely at fault) for all three goals plus the chance Fondop chipped wide.
Thats an absolute nightmare by anyone’s standards. I’m trying to remember the last time a centre-half had such a disastrous outing - maybe Liam Ridgewell?
But it wasn’t just that game. He was also at fault for Forest Green’s equaliser, for Rochdale’s opener. Remember how Yeovil exposed him.
The role I’d envisaged for him was being our 4th centre half and coming on against the more physical teams but when we needed someone to stand up to Oldham’s physicality he came up short. That’s hugely concerning. He’s not a good fit for us playing out from the back - the two best teams at playing out from the back finished 19 and 13 points above everyone else so that seems very much to be the best way to get results in this league.
The difference is that Kensdale’s main attribute was his ability on the ball in possession and that outweighed his defensive frailties.From what I've seen of Goodliffe, he's about the same standard as Kensdale was defensively. Both had a lethal mistake or two in their repertoire but, overall, both added value to the defence. My impression is that more than 50% of us regretted having to show Kensdale the door, so should not be unhappy if Goodliffe joined us permanently, if my comparison between them is shared. If we can get someone better than Goodliffe, I'd be all for it, of course.
And that's where Goulding was different/superior as well.The difference is that Kensdale’s main attribute was his ability on the ball in possession and that outweighed his defensive frailties.
With Goodliffe we’d be getting a similar standard defender without the bit that made Kensdale so good.