• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Forgive me my right-wing brothers

Stalin & Mao were communists. Comparing socialism with communism is like comparing Margaret Thatcher to Adolf Hitler.

As I've said before, Sweden I believe ticks over nicely with a socialist government and they've not forced people in Gulags...

The French had one for many years too not so long ago.

And arguably the best UK Government of the 20th Century was a socialist one - the one of Clement Atlee that introduced the Welfare State and the NHS. Though I am sure that would make an interesting debate in itself.

It is very easy to confuse Communism, Maoism, Stalinism, Lennist-Marxism, Socialism and the like because it is easier to dumb them all down as "left wing". And don't ask me to tell you the difference as we'd be here all day. And it would be very, very boring.
 
That old chestnut 'context'.....the left-wing's best friend.....

Depends what kind of left winger you mean.

If you mean a Maoist, his best friend was a gun
If you mean a Stalinist, his best friend was the central collective
If you mean a Trotskite, his best friend was on-going revolution


(the above is a left wing joke and not intended to be funny to anyone with alternative political persuassions).
 
Depends what kind of left winger you mean.

If you mean a Maoist, his best friend was a gun
If you mean a Stalinist, his best friend was the central collective
If you mean a Trotskite, his best friend was on-going revolution


(the above is a left wing joke and not intended to be funny to anyone with alternative political persuassions).

Anyone got any jokes about Hitler whilst we're giggling about mass genocide?
 
Only the old song alleging his lack of a testicle.

A classic, but sadly not true. Interesting that Goebells is described as devoid of grapefruits when the old lying ******* sired 5 kids (all murdered by their mother) and had numerous affairs. He was a bit of a boy was old JG. A total **** mind, but a bit of a boy.
 
Steveo, way to go in taking me out of context. You should get a job on the Mail or summat.

I didnt take you out of context. I just dont like the way you post, which always seems to me that you are attempting to ridicule people, or put them down, and dismiss their comments at pointless just because they disagree with you, or they dont have hundreds of facts and statistics to back themselves up with.

We may not all be as clever as you think you are but there are plenty of people who can post a lot better stuff on here than you do.

And even though you have shared a rostrum with John Lister, I think, as I have said before, that you are a pompous twit.
 
That old chestnut 'context'.....the left-wing's best friend.....

And I thought it was...

LAPV6LUA1beret.jpg
 
I didnt take you out of context. I just dont like the way you post, which always seems to me that you are attempting to ridicule people, or put them down, and dismiss their comments at pointless just because they disagree with you, or they dont have hundreds of facts and statistics to back themselves up with.

We may not all be as clever as you think you are but there are plenty of people who can post a lot better stuff on here than you do.

And even though you have shared a rostrum with John Lister, I think, as I have said before, that you are a pompous twit.

Yes you did. The debate you took my quote from involved someone making comments that were based on his opinion, whereas I countered using some facts from the ONS. In that case, then yes, I didn't deal in opinion because I had the facts to back up any debate we had. In this thread we are all talking opinions as there are no facts to back any thing up. I am not aware of any nationwide survey in America based on their knowledge of "socialism". Feel free to prove me to wrong.

Aside from that you may be right on all counts. You may of course just be another person whose skin I can get under for fun. Only time will tell.

Oh, and I've shared a rostrum with Tony Benn as well. And was also on David Amess' election material at the last General Election (but we don't talk about that. Ever!).
 
you won't get under my skin mate I don't usually take much notice of *******s.
 
You appear to be making an exception with me. Even to the point of going through my post history to find quotes in the hope you can trip me up.

Actually, it's a shame you let your fingers work before your brain. The response you really wanted to post was "How did you get on David Amess' election material?"

It's not a funny story, but it may have taken the heat out this thread a bit.
 
I'm not trying to trip you up, you do that yourself with the "I only deal in facts" bull ****. And why you would boast about Tony Benn surprises me. Wasn't he the champagne socialist of the 70's - I've made my money so now everyone else should share theirs fame. Or why write one book when I can make far more money from two. I still think you are a pompous twit. Take a lesson from the other lefties on here and learn to talk to people without appearing to be a ********.
 
Yes, you are. And you are failing. Hence the personal rhetoric and name calling.

In your eagerness to throw an insult out, you show your ignorance with comments about Tony Benn. His wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Benn is worth a read.

Whilst I'll doubt you'd take me up on my suggestion, if he does an "Afternoon With" in Southend again, go along. You may agree with nothing he says; but it is still a fascinating way to spend an evening.
 
A quick glance at your link shows he published 8 diaries and numerous books -probably made a few quid there then. He also said we should not have re taken the Fallland Islands which is a massive insult to all the British soldiers who died there, and he was a big supporter of the miners strike - how many pits did Labour re- open when they came back in power?
You obviously fancy yourself as a superior intellectual being - read your posts- you are a pompous twit who can't help himself.
 
Nah, son, your problem is that someone came along, used a facts to spoil some racist argument and you don't like it.

Bottom line, if you don't like what I post and how I post it, don't read it. It's not difficult.
 
If you are referring to the previous thread you are basing your argument on the fact that you are unable to find an internet statistic that show Poles working in the UK send money home. Have you been to Poland? Go and see how their families are structured. Speak to Polish people working here. They send money home and although you cant find definite evidence on the internet it is a fact, which as someone who only deals with facts, you should take note of.
Bottom line, if you don't like what I post and how I post it, don't read it. It's not difficult.
Another pompous effort. You cant help yourself. I wont stop reading you posts as they help me to realise what a pompous twit sounds like.
 
I did, actually speak to a few Poles. Most of them said they were going home as their econmy was in a better state than ours.

I see you didn't see (or have failed to take on board) my earlier post about the appropriate use of statistics and opinions.

I am not sure if you are my new stalker or just a troll. I'd rather appear pompous to a moron than be the moron.

Anyway, that's my last comment on this thread as I sense I am lowering myself to your standards.

LF
Pompous
 
This is your problem though isnt it. You ignore anything facts that dont suit you argument and consider people who dont agree with you to be morons. you even said you spoke to some Poles - probably didnt ask them if they sent money home as you wouldnt anted to have heard their answer.

This is also my last post on the thread as other zoners are probably getting fed up with it. Ill leave you to live in your statistical ideal world and let you get back to collecting taxes or whatever you do.
 
Back
Top