Alexshrimper
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2010
- Messages
- 282
Is it time the trust ‘stop working with Ron’ and facilitate more robust action
This is a good question. One step at a time. Once the views have been collated then options can be put on the table. The best that’s been put forward and not by the trust is the withdrawal of purchasing a season ticket.What robust action?
As is my understanding all of those things, at various stages, are already being explored/worked on by the trust.This is a good question. One step at a time. Once the views have been collated then options can be put on the table. The best that’s been put forward and not by the trust is the withdrawal of purchasing a season ticket.
This would be just the start. We should reach out to other trusts who have achieved the goal.
Then we should reach out to the MP and council
Then we should reach out to the wider fan base
Then my friend we formulate a plan and maximise leverage to remove Ron and get our club back
I disagree - the trust in my view should represent the supporter base of which once upon a time there were 30k souls in Wembley and still 5-6k average in the national league.Only thing trust realistically can do imo is drum up media attention.
It’s up to staff at the club to decide if they want to walk away or strike
And fans to protest or boycott
As we’ve seen players aren’t afraid to take action.
How could you withhold season ticket money but publicly want to ‘work with Ron’As is my understanding all of those things, at various stages, are already being explored/worked on by the trust.
I would not say this is outrageous- if we want our club back we need to be proactive. Ron is not disclosing offers so they can use the trust as a conduit. Then we can get rid of all the **** that no one else wants it.I realise what im about to say is a tad outrageous, but any consortium or mega rich man /arab who who would like to put in a bid to buy the club,i would like first to get into talks with the Shrimpers Trust before approaching RM , have a member of the trust in their /his company when talking to RM ,at least that way we will learn the ins and outs of what is going on in that mans head ,also knowing the bid put to RM is a good and reasonable offer we can then together fully support the ones trying to buy the club. Yes i know it sounds rediculous. But as been said in Shrimperzone ,RM has has offers but wont listen to them, Us knowing perhaps can put pressure on him to listen.
"Work with" in this context means "keep a line of communication open". It does not mean that things are hand in glove.How could you withhold season ticket money but publicly want to ‘work with Ron’
Hang on I thought you just had a pop at the Trust for "working with Ron" you have just suggested the exact same thing.I would not say this is outrageous- if we want our club back we need to be proactive. Ron is not disclosing offers so they can use the trust as a conduit. Then we can get rid of all the **** that no one else wants it.
This is not working with Ron - this is working with potential buyersHang on I thought you just had a pop at the Trust for "working with Ron" you have just suggested the exact same thing.
Yep because the open line of communication is working so well for us"Work with" in this context means "keep a line of communication open". It does not mean that things are hand in glove.