• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Labour Party Conference 2014

I read a comment that putting Balls in charge of the economy would be as sane as making Jimmy Saville a youth club leader.
Poor taste analogy but the message is clear.
 
Rachel Reeve has just been on the radio. Not one straight answer to a single question. She even messed up on how much a single pension is. If this is the sort of thing we have to look forward to then god help us all. All she did was trot out the same old lines without even giving a hint to how Labour are going to be an improvement. It was pitiful to listen to.

It is a frightening thought that this bunch of clowns might get in. And Rachel Reeves is thought by some to be a big hitter and a possible leader or deputy. You'd think they'd be briefed after Chuka Umunna could only name Scottish leader Johann Lamont and Kezia Dugdale - although he did not know her education portfolio when asked to list members of the shadow cabinet at Holyrood by Andrew Neil. He's supposed to be another "one for the future". God help us.
 
Those who dismiss honest concern about immigration and multiculturalism as 'nonsense' are truly 'out of touch'.

Lots of traditional Labour voters are concerned about immigration because they are the ones competing with migrants at the lower paid end of the labour market and for finite resources such as social housing and healthcare. In the meantime employers benefit by being able to keep wages at rock bottom and offering little in the way of benefits.

Those raising genuine concerns are written off as racists and bigots by privately educated Oxbridge graduates in the liberal media who live in wealthy white bread parts of London and whose jobs are immune to market forces because they are essentially a closed shop for an elite few.

If the BBC and The Guardian started driving down terms and conditions by employing migrant presenters and columnists on minimum wage zero hour contracts I suspect some of these commentators attitudes would change.
 
Lots of traditional Labour voters are concerned about immigration because they are the ones competing with migrants at the lower paid end of the Labour market and for finite resources such as social housing and healthcare. In the meantime employers benefit by being able to keep wages at rock bottom and offering little in the way of benefits.

Those raising genuine concerns are written off as racists and bigots by privately educated Oxbridge graduates in the liberal media who live in wealthy white bread parts of London and whose jobs are immune to market forces because they are essentially a closed shop for an elite few.

Wholemeal bread surely? :winking:
 
If the BBC and The Guardian started driving down terms and conditions by employing migrant presenters and columnists on minimum wage zero hour contracts I suspect some of these commentators attitudes would change.

They have tried this once before, albeit with limited success.

[video=youtube;atfNL0_KAcs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atfNL0_KAcs[/video]
 
I think milaband is just unelectable. ...the wrong brother got the top job and it will cost the party, I used to vote labour but can not bring myself to at the moment, ed balls......really? big clear out needed and a return to grass roots, even better....try and connect with rhe millions of people who dont bother voting for anyone
 
Wow, all that and the tax payers won't have to fund it? I'm amazed, I'm impressed, I'm overwhelmed. I'm resigning my membership of UKIP and hot footing it to the loving arms of those nice people who haven't been able to give a straight answer or offer an alternative for the last four years but have finally found the perfect solution and all in a 65minute speech. Amazing.
 
Lots of traditional Labour voters are concerned about immigration because they are the ones competing with migrants at the lower paid end of the labour market and for finite resources such as social housing and healthcare. In the meantime employers benefit by being able to keep wages at rock bottom and offering little in the way of benefits.

Those raising genuine concerns are written off as racists and bigots by privately educated Oxbridge graduates in the liberal media who live in wealthy white bread parts of London and whose jobs are immune to market forces because they are essentially a closed shop for an elite few.

If the BBC and The Guardian started driving down terms and conditions by employing migrant presenters and columnists on minimum wage zero hour contracts I suspect some of these commentators attitudes would change.

To be fair, I think the Grauniad does actually employ people on zero hours contracts, makes use of interns who they don't pay and publishes content for which the authors are not remunerated (I think this policy is known as "Comment is Free").

They could probably afford to pay more of these if Polly Toynbee took a paycut.
 
I missed the conference. Was there anything about how Ed Milliband intends to be less of a snivelling weed? If not, I doubt he's done much to persuade the voters.
 
Was it misleading? He gave a value and a date. Any party that thinks it should be higher or lower they can state the amount. All clear.

Rubbish, and I would have expected better of you. A 1% rise at the rate of inflation would put it up to£7.60 by 2020 anyway so for Milliband to suggest he is introducing some sort of huge rise is completely misleading.
 
Back
Top