londonblue
Topgun Pilot
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2004
- Messages
- 19,210
No surprise there then!
Justifies the reason not to bring him back on. Players safety must come first..
I'll be honest, I still cant believe no action was taken against Timlin. Eyes on the ball or not, isnt it "reckless endangerment".
Doesnt matter if you have eyes on the ball - you could have eyes on the ball and at the same time stamp on someones knee!
It was good to see such a wholehearted attempt, but each time you watch it, it looks awful from Tims!
man up Michael, you should have just "run it off" :)
I tried to do that with a broken leg playing for SZ. It doesn't work
I tried to do that with a broken leg playing for SZ. It doesn't work
Did you get treatment using the magic sponge and bucket first?
It's only reckless endangerment if Timlin meant to hurt the other player. That collision was accidental with both players competing for the ball. The referee saw nothing at all deliberately dangerous, so it wasn't.
No, its not.
Its reckless if its reckless. Intent doesn't come into it. Never has.
If it had been deemed a reckless challenge he'd have been sent off for serious foul play.
Ah - but did you try "hopping it off" or just give up and hobble off leaving the team to cover? :unsure:
Did you get treatment using the magic sponge and bucket first?