Agree totallyI really hope you are right. However :
1. exploring a sale is not the same as committing to sell. Nor are there any firm timescales in that statement - not one. In fact, he said the process would not be fast-tracked, which to me is code for "there is no urgency involved in this"
2. As I understand it this risks separating club and stadium completely....
3. ..... which is a worry as the club is effectively worthless, except for the right to play in the NL
4. Any prospective investor will want to see accounts. I saw no mention of them
To me it looks suspiciously like a piece of deflection, or a fig leaf to hide behind over a crucial period in which you as fans have to make decisions about buying season tickets. He's asking you to give him the benefit of a considerable amount of doubt - again.
Even if you take the statement at face value, it reads as though he has accepted that funding a sustainable future for SUFC is beyond him. I can think of no other plausible explanation for the high interest loan that mortgages the club's future, or the belated wish to get new capital in.
Final point - given the precarious nature of the club's financial position, does it really need to be spending what could be hundreds of thousands of pounds on consultancy fees?
What! All three of them? That's a big bed!I hope to start sleeping with Victoria Coren-Mitchell by the start of next season. But it's unlikely to happen.
This is great news. I think we will only sell to the right people, unlike what has happened at Crawley.
We could have a new stadium, decent owners and the whole footballing department in a few years time.
Listening to it I think he believes the best option would be for someone to buy club and stadium (the club only bit reflecting there might not be buyers with deep enough pockets). He then clearly said around the question of club debts, that the investment in the stadium would never be recovered by the purchase price.He said he will be selling for less that what has been invested, when pushed was revealed that figure is £25m over the time he's been there.
Are we to assume the figure is less than that. Or was he referring to the amount its cost to build the stadium?
With Stan and the American consultancy involved, I don’t think anyone like the Crawley owners are getting near. We’ll see though!Hmm. I’m confident Ron will sell. I’m not confident he’ll sell to the right people. I reckon he’d have taken Crawley’s owners’ cash.
Couldn’t agree more feel completely deflatedTotally underwhelmed with that. Ok he is going one day when it suits him, thats about it ..the rest is just the usual stuff he puts out to quell the masses.
I know you would have thought a reoter might have drilled into timelines on Fossets more, also I swaer I didn't even hear a question about staff being paid?? Did I miss it?? Or about lack of communication from the club about various issues?? We moan rightly we don't get told stuff- but he was sat there towards the end encouraging more questions, here's your chance he was saying....I watched the press conference and withdraw my previous comment. He wants to sell all as one and for a price less than the debt / build cost. Actually - that’s fair and represents the £££ from the flats build.
Other observations. He really does want to sell. I hope for a fair price.
I wish a question was asked about the timelines for the project - he said 21 months, but where is planning ? I guess this explains why capacity dropped to make it cheaper. I wonder if a buyer now may push for the original build?!?
And he didn’t get asked about wages in the interim period. A question on the embargo suggested this was still in a bad position. If he does want to sell… maybe season tickets now can pay for the next 3 months?
I read that to say in an ideal world he'd like to sell the club and the stadium as one entity but he won't, because he won't get all his money back.BBC Sport Essex
@BBCEssexSport
·
29m
Ron Martin: "In an ideal world we would like any new owner to eventually take the club and the stadium as one entity but that will not pay back everything I have put in over the years. It would be impossible to recoup.
This reads to me that he is not expecting all his money back and hopefully will sell the stadium.
Absolutely not. He was never going to sell the development. Only ever the club and new stadium once the build was under way assured. And ownership of RH and Fossets was required for that also.I find it pretty embarrassing from Ron really. He could have sold it ten years ago when it originally had planning and the whole package was worth something. He knew then he didn't have the money to make it happen. Anyone with An ounce of decency would have let it go. Finally he now admits he's out if cash and tries to sell it with out any assets.
Absolutely thisNot sure how anyone can take that nonsense of a press conference seriously.
Who is going to be interested in a Company that has not delivered final accounts since 2018?
Who is going to be interested in a Company that has a ram shackle stadium with a lease of £400.000?
Promise of a new Stadium they can lease at what cost? Still not even got planning permission!
Promise of a training facility they can lease at what cost?
Who is going to buy a company that no one knows how many millions they owe to creditors?
Absolutely not. He doesn't want to be a landlord. Thinks the best solution is to sell club and stadium. And accepts the club and stadium sale would not see the recovery of the full "investment" in the stadium. just realistic. But I think there is a difference between the "investment made in the stadium" and what is is costing him.I read that to say in an ideal world he'd like to sell the club and the stadium as one entity but he won't, because he won't get all his money back.
And here's where everything is down to interpretation....I read that to say in an ideal world he'd like to sell the club and the stadium as one entity but he won't, because he won't get all his money back.