And, i assume you have your usual agenda of being a compete penis?
Correct me if i'm wrong...
You're wrong.
Nothing about prejudice, this time it's about facts - facts that don't lie.. and facts that tell the truth. However, i will not be the one this time, who sheds the light.. however, i feel someone else, just may.
No, the issue is that you are digging around looking for facts that fit your already determined opinion and in your eagerness to back up your prejudices are misinterpreting the relevance of the facts.
The fact that someone may have been involved with a bankrupt company does not mean they were incompetent or corrupt or in any way unsuitable to run a football club. If someone was disqualified or convicted of a dishonesty offence then I would be concerned.