Twenty something days left to save the club yet we still await full details of the so called consortium's identity and proposals.
What is stopping them from revealing these to the fans ?
Maybe they are thinking that it will be a lot cheaper to buy the club off Ron once we are relegated?
Anyway, they only offered £1 as I understand it; how much cheaper do they think they're going to get it for :)
According to Elstree Blue, they approached him later with an eight figure sum.
RM obviously holds the Fossett's development at a higher value, and to be honest I don't blame him.
Indeed he seems to value it so much he is playing Russian Roulette with the football club to bring it about, and to be honest I do blame him.
Twenty something days left to save the club yet we still await full details of the so called consortium's identity and proposals.
What is stopping them from revealing these to the fans ?
Indeed he seems to value it so much he is playing Russian Roulette with the football club to bring it about, and to be honest I do blame him.
Russian Roulette is exactly how I've been thinking about our three High Court appearances so far this season.With a fourth visit due shortly I wonder how long it will be before we get the chamber with a bullet in it.
Remember The Deer Hunter?
Maybe they are waiting to take over once we are in administration.
They appeared in a fanfare of publicity, only to disappear until the next time there was media interest, what better way of getting headlines than stepping in to "save the club" .
Also they will be able to dictate how much of the debts they want to clear when they make their offer to the administrator / Creditors. As the major Creditor is RHL/MD maybe an increase the percentage they will pay might be used to facilitate some sort of deal on future rental or possibly they see the administration of one of the major assets of RHL (along with the real estate RHL will be showing the debt as an asset) and the link with the need for SUFC to survive for FF to continue as a way of ringfencing the future rental expenditure.
Thanks for that Gary, I am not going to disagree with you as I don't understand half of what you say (!) - and I know you are usually right - but I did think that they were going to step in at one point and save us from administration.
And I am certainly not pro consortium - would just like them to be out in the open about who they are and how they feel they can improve things so we supporters can make a ' valued judgement'.
Yes, because the English legal system is a complete lottery:doh:
As I understand it(and as my Chambers defines it) a lottery is an arrangement for the distribution of prizes or a matter of chance.
Since we're not likely to be awarded any prizes by the High Court why do you think the Chairman persists in his long running dispute with HMRC whose counsel has described SUFC as "habitual defaulters" and "plainly insolvent?"
What can he possibly hope to gain from this state of affairs except the winding up of the football club?
Also, please refrain from quoting just one side's counsel. You shouldn't take what one counsel says as the absolute truth. Their job is to put over one side of the argument only. They don't offer a balanced view.
The other counsel concerned refused to give out her name.Why do you think that was?
The other counsel concerned refused to give out her name.Why do you think that was?
Go on, why do you think that was?
Judging by the baying mob outside the East on Saturday, I think she was quite wise (if she didn't, that is).
Barna, I hope you won't take offence at this, but whenever I read one of your posts I find myself reaching for the razor or the anti-depressants or sometimes both!
:thump:
ACU,
No offence taken.:)
As it happens I've been feeling a bit that way myself lately especially when I dwell on matters related to SUFC.How are you going to like ground sharing with Orient,Dagenham or Gillingham next season?
In answer to your question, perhaps she had something to hide and not just her privacy?