Out of interest why couldn't there have been relegation from the national league this season? Surely the regional leagues have the capacity to take a couple of extra teams for a season with additional promotion next season.
The problem here seems to be no relegation from the NL making that league finish under different rules from which it started and making the integrity of it suspect. If they re-instated relegation everything goes back to normal right?
Yes, that’s right. Show me a good loser and I’ll show you a loser.Really..? Is that what you want to be as a club? Screw integrity, fairness & what’s right as long as it saves your own skin eh? This is like the lower divisions Superleague fiasco.
Just to make it clear, I accept that we deserve to be relegated because we finished in the relegation zone just as the bottom three in the NL finish in the relegation zone so should be relegated.If you apply that logic, then removing relegation from League Two affects the integrity of that competition for this season, and therefore there should be no promotion/relegation between League One and League Two this season.
There are two relegated clubs playing against clubs tomorrow that needs results to secure automatic promotion/play-off places respectively. Does that affect the integrity of League Two knowing they are already down?
Does the fact that were were under a self-inflicted transfer embargo for the first 15 matches of the season affect the integrity of League Two this season, because the majority of those teams got an easy three points against us whereas the others played us when we were at full-strength?
Yes, that’s right. Show me a good loser and I’ll show you a loser.
Just to make it clear, I accept that we deserve to be relegated because we finished in the relegation zone just as the bottom three in the NL finish in the relegation zone so should be relegated.
I don't see why the national league decided to not have relegation
Just to make it clear, I accept that we deserve to be relegated because we finished in the relegation zone just as the bottom three in the NL finish in the relegation zone so should be relegated.
I don't see why the national league decided to not have relegation
Are you saying a bad loser is a winner? How's that work? The bad loser still lost, they're just throwing their toys out of the pram whilst losing. A bad loser is still a loser just like the 'good loser' the only difference is people will think the bad loser is a tosser.Yes, that’s right. Show me a good loser and I’ll show you a loser.
**** Torquay and **** what’s fair. If Ron and Grimsby Ron can pull this off, that would be marvelous. I don’t understand the mentality of accepting non-League purgatory because we don’t want to upset people.
Why can't there be relegation from the national league though, there will be an imbalance anyway as there would only be 3 teams going down from the NL next season.Because the clubs in National League North and South determined that they couldn't complete the season at an earlier stage than last year when it would not be fair to apply points per game, meaning there would be no promotion. No promotion meant no relegation being applied, because if there was there would be an imbalance of teams in the National League and National League North/South.
Some clubs in National League North and South had played 11, 12, 13 or 14 fixtures of a 42-match season and decided they couldn't continue without grants rather than the suggested loans. Some clubs even argued that taking the loans offered would contravene National League regulations.
I could not give one solitary **** if the Molesley fan club and the Torquay supporter want to call me names because I want Southend to stay in the league by any means necessary.Are you saying a bad loser is a winner? How's that work? The bad loser still lost, they're just throwing their toys out of the pram whilst losing. A bad loser is still a loser just like the 'good loser' the only difference is people will think the bad loser is a tosser.
The EFL made a rod for their own backs last year by saying both promotions and relegations had to take place and if they didn’t then there couldn’t be promotion for EFL to the Prem (eg Leeds).As a Torquay fan all I can say to your chairman is this , ‘what if the situations were reversed?’ And after a long time in the Conference, infact a season in Conference South, you fight & put together a really good team under a great manager that have been through a marathon of a season which has been made harder that we could’nt be there at the ground- to go through all of that & then for the teams above to go ‘ you know I don’t like the sound of the Conference, so no relegation please’
The arrogance of it is amazing. Even if this isn’t successful to even have the possibility that the possibility promotion could be snatched away is so disheartening.
Yourselves & Grimsby not coming down with grace isn’t a good look
Why can't there be relegation from the national league though, there will be an imbalance anyway as there would only be 3 teams going down from the NL next season.
The decision to not relegate from the NL was made to convince to smaller teams in the league to carry on which they did so with much reduced costs this season, Barnet have stated that they have reduced costs this season to invest extra money next season.
My view is that the National League season can't be completed without relegation from the national league because that is the terms under which they started the season.I'm really struggling to understand this argument. At some stage in the process, there has to be no relegation because seasons weren't finished. It stands to reason that this point is where no promotion is applied. That is between the National League and National League North and South, because those divisions didn't get to a stage where they could be completed, either on the pitch or via points per game.
The National League had to continue to ensure it kept its promotion places to the EFL (it's why it battled for 'elite' status under the Government Covid regulations last summer). There's no reason to create an artificial imbalance this season (outside of that created by the sad demise of Macclesfield Town) by applying relegation at a stage where there's no promotion in the other direction.
Yourselves & Grimsby not coming down with grace isn’t a good look
My view is that the National League season can't be completed without relegation from the national league because that is the terms under which they started the season.
The NL chamged their rules so why can't the EFL?