Thats the issue though, as soon as you put your hands on someone, whether there is intent or not, it’s very possible that harm could occur to that individual
Did he mean to shove him over the wall in that manner? No, probably not. But as soon as he pushed him, he’d lost control of the situation and the outcome. And you’re right, both the security and fans would have been held accountable. But it shouldn’t have got to that stage.
The question is, did he need to push him? It didn’t particularly look like the fans were trying to advance at that point, and I’m lead to believe that it was due to the security dragging at the banner, that forced the fans - who refused to let go of it - over the wall to begin with (same as Tuesday night).
I fully agree with you that videos can be misleading, and we haven’t seen what’s gone before it, but from what we’ve been told and my view (admittedly a poor one from the East Blacks) both yesterday and Tuesday were the direct result of security interfering. To me, the fans seemed quite content on simply holding it at the front of W Block. Happy to be corrected here, but on Tuesday the fans only came onto the pitch, after the security tried to wrestle the banner from them. Yesterday, it seemed they came on the pitch because of this pushing incident which lead to an angry surge. Again, this all stemmed from trying to get that banner away from the fans.
What is the big deal with them holding a banner, I wonder? I can’t imagine it impedes anyone’s view as nobody sits down in W Block, and It can’t be because of advertising as there is none on the seats. Who gave the order to confiscate it? Why was it such a big deal to stop that banner being brandished? Why were Chesterfield fans allowed to hold it up for the best part of 20 minutes with zero interference?
I’ll say again, I’m not condoning the actions of the fans for going onto the pitch, but to me this wasn’t a planned pitch invasion, and is more a case of cause and effect.