• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

£42k a year benefits!

I wouldn't want to raise 7 kids on £42K PA.

If they aren't doing anything illegal blame the system, not them.
 
I wouldn't want to raise 7 kids on £42K PA.

If they aren't doing anything illegal blame the system, not them.

Indeed. This is where New Labour have let the country down, a tenet of Blair in 1997 was his clarion call to think the unthinkable on Welfare Reform. In short they've done the square root of **** all.
 
its a bit of unfair reporting 9K of that is carers and disability allowance for their son and 4k is family allowance which anybody could have if they wanted 7 kids.
 
its a bit of unfair reporting 9K of that is carers and disability allowance for their son and 4k is family allowance which anybody could have if they wanted 7 kids.

Dosnt make as good a story then . Mind you any one wanting 7 kid's these days is bloody idiot ! Wonder how much the Telegraph paid for the story ;)
 
This is the sort of situation where a cap on the number of children the state will support should be in place or more radically sterilisation. Sums this country up though unfortunately
 
This is the sort of situation where a cap on the number of children the state will support should be in place or more radically sterilisation. Sums this country up though unfortunately

As that is flawed , stupid and against any form of basic human rights ....
Err no . Education , well regulated and though out welfare syustem and less emphasis on buying the next biggest best thing (2 pc's 3 consuls and sky come off it !) Would sort the issue.

People have already stated and failed on here when they make generalised sweeping statements on other social types on their rights to live and how successful they are in society .
 
As that is flawed , stupid and against any form of basic human rights ....
Err no . Education , well regulated and though out welfare syustem and less emphasis on buying the next biggest best thing (2 pc's 3 consuls and sky come off it !) Would sort the issue.

People have already stated and failed on here when they make generalised sweeping statements on other social types on their rights to live and how successful they are in society .

So as you have buried someones opinion what would be your plan.
 
This is the sort of situation where a cap on the number of children the state will support should be in place or more radically sterilisation. Sums this country up though unfortunately

Rather screws the large number of full-time carers who are doing a brilliant job bringing up groups of fostered/adopted children though.
 
surely regardless of the maths, the situation where you can jack your job in sit at home all day on your *** watching sky tv on your flat screen and be better of then work just shouldnt exist, makes me want to resign and put my feet up
 
Back
Top