dannypav
President
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2011
- Messages
- 6,001
Being on loan has IMO got everything to do with it.
Woodrow was never ever going to join the club yet received unbelievable treatment in his copious time on the pitch likewise Barnard.
Now if either player were/did score for fun I would be the first on here praising them from the rooftops.
Why does being on loan matter ?
Surely if they've been brought to the club for a season or a month , they have every right to be selected on merit with the contracted players.
No point in having loanees if that's not the case.
If you're saying that Loza , Barnard and Woodrow aren't as good as Corr and Eastwood ( the current one not the old one ) , then that becomes a matter of opinion.
I actually think all 3 are potentially better than the other two right now , although Corr does also give us something different and played a big part in our great run earlier.