• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Essex v. Surrey

Matt the Shrimp

aka Harry Potter
Whilst we're waiting for the Test to start, I thought I'd have a look at more parochial matters - namely how our beloved county is getting on.

Shame to lose out to a rampant Sussex in the C&G the other night. A monstrous innings by Murray Goodwin (blimey!) for Sussex - 158 off 151 balls - completely took the game away from us, despite having posted a very useful 296/6 off our 50 overs (thanks to 132 off 143 from Sir Ronald) and then having reduced Sussex to 56/4...

sad.gif


That win leaves Sussex top of the Southern Section with 5 wins out of 5, and looking difficult to stop... since, am I right in thinking that the C&G has been completely re-arranged this season, so that all the Southern Counties play each other in a big group, ditto for all the Northern Counties, and that the winner of each of the two groups goes straight to Lord's for the final...?

rock.gif


That being so, Sussex are looking well-set, it must be said.

* * *

As for the County Championship, we look in reasonable shape - second in the table on 69 points (same as leaders Derbyshire), and with a big game against third placed Surrey, nine points behind but with a game in hand.

It is Surrey who are hosting us today, and having won the toss and elected to bat, we're currently 81-0 off 25 overs - with our opening pair of Chopra (37*) and Pettini (44*) still both continuing their decent form.

smile.gif


Matt
 
It is the case in the C&G that the top two make it to the final at Lords in August. I quite like this league format, but if a team loses a match through weather they are immediately on the backfoot. Therefore it may be a better idea that the top two teams in each section have a semi final and then the final.

The perennial Essex problem of bowling penetration in the 4 day game still exists, and they look a little threadbere without the dancing king Goughie. Noticed that Alex Tudor played against Glos last week, and hope his return was not another false dawn for him. I think that Andy Bichel is due as the 2nd overseas player in June, so that should help the bowling.

It has to be said that Essex have some good young talent in Chopra, Pettini & Palladino. Cook is now seemingly an England regular, hope James Foster could join him soon. Jefferson is due back from injury soon, and was bowling in the winter, would like to see the ball coming down from 8ft plus. Plus they have two or three other promising quicks in Chambers, Westfield & Zahid (i think), trouble is all 3 have some sort of injury.

The one day side is as good as any in the country once they have the guile of Gough back, and it would be great to see them get promoted to Division one in the championship.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (canveyshrimper @ May 31 2006,13:11)]hope James Foster could join him soon
Absolutely. With Jones dropping more than he catches (seemingly), there's inevitably some speculation about his future in the side... and yet the only name that ever gets mentioned is Chris Read.

OK, so Read's glovework is good - but I don't think he's as good a batsman as Fozzie, whose glovework is also pretty tidy (and better than Jones's). And yet Fozzie never gets mentioned, which is a tad irksome...

sad.gif


Certainly agree with your assessment of Essex's riches of youth - good news for the county and for England, that is. Very interesting to hear about Big Will having a bowl... although it's quite a late development for him to start turning his arm, is it not? However, talk about "steepling bounce" - it'll be Joel Garner revisited!

biggrin.gif
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Matt the Shrimp @ May 31 2006,14:25)]OK, so Read's glovework is good - but I don't think he's as good a batsman as Fozzie
Need him to prove it now!
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Matt the Shrimp @ May 31 2006,14:25)]OK, so Read's glovework is good - but I don't think he's as good a batsman as Fozzie, whose glovework is also pretty tidy (and better than Jones's).  And yet Fozzie never gets mentioned, which is a tad irksome...

sad.gif


Certainly agree with your assessment of Essex's riches of youth - good news for the county and for England, that is.  Very interesting to hear about Big Will having a bowl... although it's quite a late development for him to start turning his arm, is it not?  However, talk about "steepling bounce" - it'll be Joel Garner revisited!

biggrin.gif
Agree about Read with the bat, it is interesting to note that Fozzie has a first class 200 to his name, and is quite high in the averages already this season. It is an odd thing with Foster, centrally contracted, gets an injury, plays an Ashes test in Oz last tour and gets forgotten about.

I was told that Will Jefferson dod bowl a lot when he was at under 19, and when he first came to Essex, but a disc problem caused him to stop a few years ago. By all accounts his back is now in good enough condition for him to resume.
 
344-8 - top response from the 9th wicket pairing of Andre Adams and Sir Ronald Irani after Ian Salisbury ripped out the lower-middle order!  Only 6 runs from the 4th batting point... come on Essex!

biggrin.gif




 
4th batting point obtained - possibly with a 6 from Andre Adams! Game on! 351/8 - 49 runs needed in 30 overs for us to get the full five batting points...
 
This is where having almost a team of all-rounders help, as if the main batsman fail we still have a good chance. Hopefully Ronnie can hit us to 400 and max batting points, though whether Palladino can stay with him remains to be seen.

Close of play 365-9
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Museshrimper @ May 31 2006,18:44)]whether Palladino can stay with him remains to be seen
And the answer to that is...



...no, he can't!

upside.gif
tounge.gif
oops.gif


Essex 365 all out, Palladino lasted 3 balls against Salisbury. Surrey 3 bonus points, Essex 4 points. Surrey 9/0 after 2 overs, with some very tasty batting to come - Ramprakash, Butcher, Rikki Clarke and Azhar Mahmood...

suspect.gif
 
Can someone either explain what the points system is or get a link to it for me? I'm confused as to how a team can have 100 points before 5 games are played. Mind you, being in Gloucester, we don't pay much attention to the cricket.
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary Andys man club
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top