Tilly getting the message ?

[CC51DAS]

Looks like Tilly's going along with the request I sent him yesterday ....


to the tune of God rest ye merry gentlemen .....

STEVE REST THAT FAIRY DEAN MORGAN
HE FILLS ME WITH DISMAY

PLEASE PICK SOMEONE WHO WANTS IT MORE
AND MAKE MY CHRISTMAS DAY

THEN SIGN SOME LADS IN JANUARY
WHO'LL EARN THE RIGHT TO PLAY

OH BUY ME SOMEONE WHO'LL SCORE SOME GOALS
SCORE SOME GOALS

OH BUY ME SOMEONE WHO'LL SCORE SOME GOALS


:fart: - ITS CHRISTMAS

 

[Andy_S]

He's not getting the message about ****ing substitutions though is he. :confused:

 

[Jay_Shrimper]

Why substitute when your winning and on top of things?

He'll never ****ing learn.

Tilson OUT. :mad:

 

[C'mon you Shrimpers]

Why substitute when your winning and on top of things?

He'll never ****ing learn.

Tilson OUT. :mad:

Christ make your ****ing mind up

 

[Pubey]

had he learnt the barrett and clarke message yet? definitely think it should be richards in for barrett, at least for the fa cup game if not sooner

 

[Jay_Shrimper]

Agreed...or go 5-3-2.

......................... COLLIS .............................

Hammell ... Barrett ... Richards ... Clarke ... Hunt

........Bailey ........ McCormack ........ Maher.......

...........Macdonald ........... Leeeeeon................

Think that would work quite well. :thump:

Edit: He may well be learning:
http://www.southendunited.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10444~1199228,00.html

 

[Pubey]

Agreed...or go 5-3-2.

......................... COLLIS .............................

Hammell ... Barrett ... Richards ... Clarke ... Hunt

........Bailey ........ McCormack ........ Maher.......

...........Macdonald ........... Leeeeeon................

Think that would work quite well. :thump:

Edit: He may well be learning:
http://www.southendunited.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10444~1199228,00.html

and drop gower!? you must be getting through the sherry!

 

[Jay_Shrimper]

Maybe swap Gower for Maher.

 

[stickyboy]

Edit: He may well be learning:
http://www.southendunited.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10444~1199228,00.html

No blame on the Ref ? Must be a first

 

[Boreham Shrimper]

No blame on the Ref ? Must be a first

A bit harsh, but I get your point. By the sounds of things, we should have finished this game off and I think Tilly understands that from the interview.

 

[DTS]

Agreed...or go 5-3-2.

......................... COLLIS .............................

Hammell ... Barrett ... Richards ... Clarke ... Hunt

........Bailey ........ McCormack ........ Maher.......

...........Macdonald ........... Leeeeeon................

Think that would work quite well. :thump:

Edit: He may well be learning:
http://www.southendunited.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10444~1199228,00.html

Can I have some of the crack you have just smoked?

So not only have you added a defender to make us even more defensive you have removed our only form of creativity?????

 

[canveyshrimper]

He's not getting the message about ****ing substitutions though is he. :confused:

Why make a sub just for the sake of it?

 

[Andy_S]

Why make a sub just for the sake of it?

My point is that fresh legs can undoubtedly make a difference. We had chance after chance and with the players already on missing everything that came their way, what is to say Hooper or Morgan might have put at least one of those chances away as the game wore on? Even more so at this time of year when players will be more worn down than normal and mistakes can creep in due to tiredness.

In the same situation as we had yesterday, would Wenger, Ferguson or Mourinho left it until the 88th minute to introduce fresh legs? Methinks not.

 

[Ailsa Road Shrimper]

In the same situation as we had yesterday, would Wenger, Ferguson or Mourinho left it until the 88th minute to introduce fresh legs? Methinks not.

Would Wenger, Ferguson or Mourinho ever have a bench of Flahavan, Francis, Moussa, Morgan and Hooper to choose from? Nobody had a bad game yesterday apart from maybe Leon Clarke, so what would've been achieved by substituting players who were doing well with inferior ones?

 

[Andy_S]

On that basis then if they're not good enough to come on at Gillingham then what is the point in having them in the squad I ask?

 

[Ailsa Road Shrimper]

On that basis then if they're not good enough to come on at Gillingham then what is the point in having them in the squad I ask?

Presumably to replace an injured player or somebody having a bad game. The only player having a bad game yesterday was probably Leon Clarke but it wasn't viable to substitute him as he's our biggest goalscoring threat.

 

[sufcintheprem]

The problem with the subs debate is you never know what would have happened if you had made a change in comparison to what happened when you kept it as it is (and vice versa of course).

More significantly, I can't imagine the presence of Clarke or Hooper would have made much difference defensively.

 

[Beefy]

My point is that fresh legs can undoubtedly make a difference. We had chance after chance and with the players already on missing everything that came their way, what is to say Hooper or Morgan might have put at least one of those chances away as the game wore on? Even more so at this time of year when players will be more worn down than normal and mistakes can creep in due to tiredness.

That's some cracking hindsight you've got there.

The players we had one were creating chance, after chance, after chance so why change them for players who aren't as good? It makes no sense.