Wet Sham escape again?

[Rusty Shackleford]

Apologies if this has already been discussed, but I was listening to H&J on Talksport today, and they mentioned that West Ham should have been deducted 10 points because their parent company went into administration, following the precedent of Southampton. Coupled with their good fortune on the Tevez affair, do you get the feeling that the tossers have friends in high places (Brooking?)?

 

[chapperzUK]

Have you got a link to this?

 

[Firestorm]

I think the difference is that Southamptons Holding company was exactly that, a company whose only assets were Southampton FC and St Marys, the set up was in place to enable Southampton FC to directly avoid administration should things go pear shaped

Whereas West ham were owned by Bjorgolfur Gudmundsson and Hansa Holdings and West Ham were one of their many assets.

 

[BLUEBLOOD]

Great prefix on this thread by the way Rusty

Good work indeed :clap: :clap:

 

[Rusty Shackleford]

Have you got a link to this?

No, I just heard it being discussed on Talksport. I was about to go and look for one, but then thought bollocks, he can look for himself.