rigsby
Life President⭐
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,054
i have been told he only does 3 days a week ??
Well he only gets paid for one
i have been told he only does 3 days a week ??
He does have other business interests. But I'd imagine being CEO of Southend (or any large company) you're expected to just put in the number of hours that are required and be on call 24 x 7. He might only be in the office 3 days but I'd be surprised if he only put in 24 hours of work a week (3 x 8 hour days)i have been told he only does 3 days a week ??
L and indeed OLi have been told he only does 3 days a week ??
He does have other business interests. But I'd imagine being CEO of Southend (or any large company) you're expected to just put in the number of hours that are required and be on call 24 x 7. He might only be in the office 3 days but I'd be surprised if he only put in 24 hours of work a week (3 x 8 hour days)
What were you expecting then? At the moment, without Tom Lawrence, I doubt we would still have a Club.umm ... 1 to 3 days a week with other business interests ..
not quite the super hero I was expecting ...
Perhaps if you think he is not pulling his weight you could pop in and help him out...all unpaid of course!umm ... 1 to 3 days a week with other business interests ..
not quite the super hero I was expecting ...
Perhaps if you think he is not pulling his weight you could pop in and help him out...all unpaid of course!
Well just goes to show just how hard he works for the club then doesnt it Rayligh boy .i have been told he only does 3 days a week ??
i have been told he only does 3 days a week ??
some mothers do have themumm ... 1 to 3 days a week with other business interests ..
not quite the super hero I was expecting ...
By who ? Share your source so we can know never to believe anything from therei have been told he only does 3 days a week ??
Let's not measure in days, let's measure in hours. I suspect he's doing far more hours than 3 days would equate to.Tom L was working full time for us initially and the plan always was to go down to 3 days a week but would always be accessible as he has been. In fact he was doing probably more like 6 or 7 days a week due to his passion for the club and although hes reduced the documented time to 3 days a week, he puts so much time into southend its crazy!. Fortunately Tom has a lovely suppportive understanding family. Reducing to 3 days was enable him to make up his money by doing his normal occupation as well. Southend obviously were never going to match what he could earn in his normal occupational work etc. 3 days is purely a headline because he does way more than that a week for Southend. Plus Im aware he hasnt taken any wages for a few months due to trying to pay everyone else first.
I wont be sharing my source so no point asking! Everyone can make their own mind up if they feel its accurate or not.
Absolutely!Let's not measure in days, let's measure in hours. I suspect he's doing far more hours than 3 days would equate to.
It is not how long you are there that matters. What is important is how you spend that time.He does have other business interests. But I'd imagine being CEO of Southend (or any large company) you're expected to just put in the number of hours that are required and be on call 24 x 7. He might only be in the office 3 days but I'd be surprised if he only put in 24 hours of work a week (3 x 8 hour days)
Someone on twitter said “black is white”Someone on Twitter is saying that Ron refused to pay for Arnold’s operation which is why it’s taken so long. And allegedly he did the same with Cardwell, so Harry’s dad ended up footing the bill.
Anyone know if that’s correct?
this post illustrates perfectly why it’s so difficult for the majority of us who are not in the know to have a clue what is going on. The OP explained how he received the information- 1st hand , from someone he knew ,” who was a coach “ and therefore it seems reasonable ( to me) to take it at face value.Now that the coaches have been paid. It is time to clarify a few points that shrimperjon got wrong.
The coaches were and have never been on strike. Although going unpaid they carried on coaching as they care too much for the players in their care to do anything that would hinder their development. The person who told shrimperjon, although an employee is not a coach and has since apologised to his fellow employees for the distress caused by the title of this thread. In future please get facts right if you going to make potentially explosive statements regarding people who are and continue to work in a very stressful situation.