• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

2 murders by racist thugs !!!

I wonder GB, if you've ever done jury service? It's a real eye opener and brings into focus how much damage can be done by generalising.
 
There's plenty of evidence that the McCanns left their three pre-school children ALONE and UNCARED FOR. For that alone, they deserve a full hatchet job, and I would be interested to hear your source for there being 'NO evidence' implicating them in Maddy's disappearance.

As for GB's original statement on this thread, the Lawrence case received ten times the coverage that the Donald case did, because the liberal consensus only sees racism as a one way street. As I mentioned in an earlier thread, when anti-Semitic attacks in Europe were thought to be the work of the far right, they were being investigated by an EC commission. When it was later discovered that most of the attacks (more than 90%) were the work of Muslims, the investigation ceased.

The only accepted racism is the work of shaven headed illiterate white yobs (see Keith Allen in 'The Yob' for a visual) - motivated by the BNP and the Daily Mail. Anything else is either a lie, not racially motivated, or the white person's fault because his/her ancestors were mean in civilizing the world hundreds of years ago. Or it's the fault of the Daily Mail.

As an aside, I am grateful to the Mail on Sunday for the excllent Cliff Richard CD they gave away yesterday. Cracking stuff. Hail Sir Cliff.[/quote]

Dont believe he's a christian..in his secluded manor in the depths of Essex, Sir Harry practices dark dark magic on you all...he is a messanger from Beelzebub I tell you!!

play the songs backwards.....eeerie, why do you think they released it just after halloween!!??
 
Dont believe he's a christian..in his secluded manor in the depths of Essex, Sir Harry practices dark dark magic on you all...he is a messanger from Beelzebub I tell you!!

You may be right there - the video to 'Devil Woman' is deeply disturbing. That said, it's one of the most important records of the pop era.
 
to be fair,

the matthews family looked a dodgy bunch,their demeanour appeared false.

the maddy story,i was convinced the parents were involved .

the ross and brand debate rumbles on,the reality in my book is they must have enough material without making crank phone calls.

Ok

perhaps a better example.

Ben Kinsella's death vs any of the other 15 kids stabbed before him in 2008.Media coverage , discuss.....

Media coverage is dependant on how news worthy the item is , will it increase or at worst maintain , the circulation or is it what the readers of the particular publication want.

Now to a newspaper such as the Daily Mail a story of a lad in South London being killed on the streets in an unprovoked attack is much more geared to their "We are all going to die, England is going to pot" Editorial angle than a premeditated kidnap in a country the paper has little or no circulation in .
 
Blimey I think that sums up the fact that you believe everything you read in the "popular press". There was absolutely NO evidence that the McCanns were involved and the wonderful British press did a hatchet job on them and Robert Murat.

And I didn't realise that you were a criminal psychologist GB. Their demeanour looked "false". Watch out Cracker....


i think RS summed it up perfectly.

in addition the porteguese police thought they were involved,maybe the portuegues police read /believe the british press as well??

the matthews story for me never rung true,even when the british press were banging on regarding missing child and the parents are beside themseleves with worry.

just an educated guess from me.
 
spanish,

your line were you state its a multi race country and goverment has to tread carefully in order not to cause unrest.

is 100% correct.
 
I wonder GB, if you've ever done jury service? It's a real eye opener and brings into focus how much damage can be done by generalising.

consider this,

if you or i stood on a soapbox in any town centre spounting racial hatred we would within minutes be rightly arrested.

yet


the police cordon off streets in london to allow preachers to spout anything they desire.

your comments please OBL
 
consider this,

if you or i stood on a soapbox in any town centre spounting racial hatred we would within minutes be rightly arrested.

yet


the police cordon off streets in london to allow preachers to spout anything they desire.

your comments please OBL

untrue

To be able to demonstrate or 'soapbox' it, you have to apply to your local police station for a licence and you have to talk to your community officer responsible for this.

This has to be done in writing at least 31(?) days prior to your demonstration, and only after its been agreed by the Chief Constable, other wise you are causing a disturbance and are lioable for arrest..breach of the peace or even worse, depending on the subject matter.

And you are only allowed one placard per person!!!! disgrace
 
Speakers' Corner was a wonderful place in the old days, what you are referring to is more to do with political correctness in my opinion. Of course I get your point, but you nor I have the clout of greedy civil rights lawyers at our heels to act on our behalf the minute the "establishment" reacts.
 
untrue

To be able to demonstrate or 'soapbox' it, you have to apply to your local police station for a licence and you have to talk to your community officer responsible for this.

This has to be done in writing at least 31(?) days prior to your demonstration, and only after its been agreed by the Chief Constable, other wise you are causing a disturbance and are lioable for arrest..breach of the peace or even worse, depending on the subject matter.

And you are only allowed one placard per person!!!! disgrace


so the events which were showed on news progs and in the papers is all untrue?
 
consider this,

if you or i stood on a soapbox in any town centre spounting racial hatred we would within minutes be rightly arrested.

yet


the police cordon off streets in london to allow preachers to spout anything they desire.

your comments please OBL

I agree I have not see one of the people I have seen preaching in Southend High Street get arrested.

True I have not heard one preacher spouting racial hatred either.
Although the police I did ask for assistance at one stage was unsure if extolling the virtues of killing a thousand Phillistines with a bit of a Donkeys gob was incitement to racial hatred....
 
so the events which were showed on news progs and in the papers is all untrue?


again, you havnt read your previous post in relation to my answer.
It is the right of anyone in this country to hold a civilised demonstration.

but, you do have to have permission to do so. anyone holding an unlawful meeting or demonstration is liable for arrest.

I refer to my earlier, long winded post, dont believe everything you read or watch in the media.

does that make it clearer?

i'm not surprised that you only picked one point from my diatribe...like the newspapers, nicely edited.


still strawberries
 
again, you havnt read your previous post in relation to my answer.
It is the right of anyone in this country to hold a civilised demonstration.

but, you do have to have permission to do so. anyone holding an unlawful meeting or demonstration is liable for arrest.

I refer to my earlier, long winded post, dont believe everything you read or watch in the media.

does that make it clearer?

i'm not surprised that you only picked one point from my diatribe...like the newspapers, nicely edited.


still strawberries


take any event in the world,

what source do you believe is explaining said event in correct and truthful way.
 
There's plenty of evidence that the McCanns left their three pre-school children ALONE and UNCARED FOR. For that alone, they deserve a full hatchet job, and I would be interested to hear your source for there being 'NO evidence' implicating them in Maddy's disappearance.[\QUOTE]

Yes I agree, they left their kids alone which was obviously a stupid mistake, but there was NO evidence that they harmed Maddie in any way despite the lurid, hysterical accusations in the press.
 
consider this,

if you or i stood on a soapbox in any town centre spounting racial hatred we would within minutes be rightly arrested.

yet


the police cordon off streets in london to allow preachers to spout anything they desire.

your comments please OBL

Starting to wonder about you now. Are you real or is this a wind up?
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary Beecham
Andys man club Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top