So it's not that you're not suggesting that those not in the know are not not in the know?No I’m suggesting that those not in the know are.
Seems fair enough.
So it's not that you're not suggesting that those not in the know are not not in the know?No I’m suggesting that those not in the know are.
While I agree with much of what you say the Club surely must be aware that supporters are always going to be curious about the sudden disappearance of a first team regular.Indeed. I'm not sure why we should expect everything to be communicated, especially things that might be commercially sensitive such as embargoes and wages. I'm also not sure why we should expect the club to make public things that players themselves might want to be kept personal, such as operations.
For clarity, I'm not suggesting SA didn't want everyone to know, just that it is possible.
Maybe there's a lesson for a number of fans to learn, such as not always jump to conclusions and accept that maybe there's another reason for certain things, e.g. players not playing well, and get off their backs.
You are Sir Humphry Appleby and I claim my £5 (One for the older Zoners there... )But what if those in the know don't know that they are in the know, does that mean they are really not in the know even though they are in the know but as they don't know they are in the know then they can't be said to be in the know? Does anyone know?
You are Sir Humphry Appleby and I claim my £5 (One for the older Zoners there... )
Didn't Kursall Flyers have their hit single with that little ditty?But what if those in the know don't know that they are in the know, does that mean they are really not in the know even though they are in the know but as they don't know they are in the know then they can't be said to be in the know? Does anyone know?
There’s always a balance between keeping the fans informed and tipping off the opposition who is fit and available and who is not.
I felt Molesley left no surprises for us or our opponents with his weekly injury update.
While I agree with much of what you say the Club surely must be aware that supporters are always going to be curious about the sudden disappearance of a first team regular.
And Phil often talks way too much.
If the Club felt for whatever reason they did not want to or could not release any information about the operation it was surely not too much to ask that people in positions of influence might think before they speak.
If he is not in Phil's plans airing publicly that a contracted player is not wanted is a bad look, especially so now with the guy in hospital.
If he is in Phil's plans it looks even worse.
This little episode has us looking like amateur hour (again!) and was completely avoidable.
With football fans you can never get it right. If we don’t know the ins and outs that’s wrong. If we know the ins and outs it’s unprofessional. When teams start winning funnily enough these things are less of an issue.Fans have spent months demanding in some cases, the whole squad have their contracts torn up. PB agree with you on 1 or 2 because we all want honesty and be informed....Look at the result.
Football fans are like little children they are best left in a world of fantasy whilst you can. Real life is just around the corner and it isn't always that nice
Or Donald Rumsfeld's known unknown pieceYou are Sir Humphry Appleby and I claim my £5 (One for the older Zoners there... )
Considering nearly every game he played he went down at the slightest knock and came off injured a lot, I am not surprised he needed an operation.
Perhaps they were fitting him with a pair of balls