• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Front page of todays Echo Wed 19th Feb

No ones to blame apart from the people silly enough to actually do it. You down a pint of vodka, your just asking for trouble.

Glad she's okay though. Bet she won't be having a drink for a while (we've all been there).
 
In respect to wages it may be. I don't have the figures but a bottle of cheapy crappy cider is (or was) actually cheaper than a bottle of water.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/04/sale-ultra-cheap-alcohol-banned

I'm pretty sure wages haven't increased 50% in the last 15 years, but alcohol being cheaper than non-alcoholic drinks is nothing new either. When I was at university it was cheaper to buy an alcoholic drink than to get a non-alcholic drink from the vending machine.

Anyway, I'm surprised to see you take big business's side on this. You're on the side of the drinks manufacturers who want minimum pricing as it'll make their products more profitable. I think if you'll look into the research groups and think-tanks proposing this that their funding grants come from the drinks industry....

I'd suggest a bigger factor is that the increased cost of drinking in pubs has driven young drinkers out of regulated environments where bar staff aren't allowed to serve the inebriated and clubs where bouncers chuck you out if you fall over too many times, to drinking at home where there aren't such obstacles.
 
I'm pretty sure wages haven't increased 50% in the last 15 years, but alcohol being cheaper than non-alcoholic drinks is nothing new either. When I was at university it was cheaper to buy an alcoholic drink than to get a non-alcholic drink from the vending machine.

Anyway, I'm surprised to see you take big business's side on this. You're on the side of the drinks manufacturers who want minimum pricing as it'll make their products more profitable. I think if you'll look into the research groups and think-tanks proposing this that their funding grants come from the drinks industry....

I'd suggest a bigger factor is that the increased cost of drinking in pubs has driven young drinkers out of regulated environments where bar staff aren't allowed to serve the inebriated and clubs where bouncers chuck you out if you fall over too many times, to drinking at home where there aren't such obstacles.

Not on anyone's side YB. I was just reporting the numbers.
 
Back
Top