• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

MEP Elections

Recent research has shown that immigration (especially from the EU) has been shown to have a positive effect on the UK economy.

"Those from the European Economic Area (EEA - the EU plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) had made a particularly positive contribution in the decade up to 2011
, the authors noted, contributing 34% more in taxes than they received in benefits and services."


..."between 1995-2011, on average each EEA immigrant put about £6,000 more into the public purse than they took out."

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25880373[/QUOTE

From the same article, and to add balance;

However, studying the numbers in the UCL report more closely, another finding emerges.

And that is, that if you look at the figures for the whole of the period under study, 1995-2011, immigration has been a drain on the public purse.

To the tune of about £95bn.

But what we really want to know is, are immigrants creating added value? That is, are we all better off because of the newcomers?

Two groups are generally believed to be clear beneficiaries of immigration - the immigrants themselves, who move from poor countries to ones where more opportunities are on offer, and the employers of cheap labour.

And of course it's not just a question of economics and numbers. There are less tangible effects to consider. The impact on culture, on community, for example - important considerations, which are difficult to measure.
 
As UKIP's MEP's voted against or abstained against an equal pay act for women, they can kiss my stinky butt if they think they're getting my vote.

Maybe any female ShrimperZoner might want to take that into account before a vote for Farage and his bunch of dinosaurs. Or even us men with mothers, wives, daughters, sisters, aunts, nieces, and female friends.

We already have an equal pay act, voted for by the UK parliament.
 
That's the point though....shouldn't it be upto the respective goverment's to decide this?

hence UKIP didn't vote on something which changed nothing in the UK? is that your meaning?
For my vote, and I urge all to vote, (always), I will vote UKIP: but not as I agree with them, only to give the main parties one less voter; or maybe green? It is hard to know which way to waste a vote!
 
hence UKIP didn't vote on something which changed nothing in the UK? is that your meaning?
For my vote, and I urge all to vote, (always), I will vote UKIP: but not as I agree with them, only to give the main parties one less voter; or maybe green? It is hard to know which way to waste a vote!

Partly, but think its more than that.
The uk electorate have only ever voted directly on economic union with Europe, not Political...yet here we have more interference.
In MK's original post the implication is that UKIP are against equal pay, that simply isn't the case.
What they did is abstain in a meaningless vote for the UK on the principal that the European parliament should not be interfering .
 
Partly, but think its more than that.
The uk electorate have only ever voted directly on economic union with Europe, not Political...yet here we have more interference.
In MK's original post the implication is that UKIP are against equal pay, that simply isn't the case.
What they did is abstain in a meaningless vote for the UK on the principal that the European parliament should not be interfering .

How do Europe interfere with us politically? I thought we were free to vote for whom we like?
 
How do Europe interfere with us politically? I thought we were free to vote for whom we like?

You can vote for who you like, but perhaps not what you like.
An amount of legislation / Law (the actual amount is a whole new can of worms) that is passed now come from the EU.
When did you vote for this to happen?
 
You can vote for who you like, but perhaps not what you like.
An amount of legislation / Law (the actual amount is a whole new can of worms) that is passed now come from the EU.
When did you vote for this to happen?

When we elected our MEPs and delegated the voting etc to them
 
And? This is obviously UKIP's mentality - wanting to take us back to the 1950s. I think I shall vote, just to keep these cretins away from any kind of power.

Sorry?....how could an act voted for in the seventies take us back to the fifties ?
 
What I mean is this is obviously how they think. That women don't deserve to be paid the same as men for doing the same job.

What is being said and not just by UKIP, is that if 1973 act needs updating... it is for the member state's parliament ie the UK to decide.
Whats wrong with that??
 
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25880373

And of course it's not just a question of economics and numbers. There are less tangible effects (of immigration) to consider. The impact on culture, on community, for example - important considerations, which are difficult to measure.[/QUOTE

This,of course,is the essence of UKIP's appeal to Little Englanders.

Personally,I'm always happy to visit multi-racial Britain and to live in multi-racial Spain.
 
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25880373

And of course it's not just a question of economics and numbers. There are less tangible effects (of immigration) to consider. The impact on culture, on community, for example - important considerations, which are difficult to measure.[/QUOTE

This,of course,is the essence of UKIP's appeal to Little Englanders.

Personally,I'm always happy to visit multi-racial Britain and to live in multi-racial Spain.

Does Farage remind you in anyway of Alan Partridge...or is it just me?
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary Beecham
Andys man club Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top