hlane17
⭐
When was the last season we were embargo free from start to finish? Must have been 2018-2019?When was the last time we weren’t in an embargo, I can’t really remember which is ridiculous!
When was the last season we were embargo free from start to finish? Must have been 2018-2019?When was the last time we weren’t in an embargo, I can’t really remember which is ridiculous!
Not really. The sale alone is enough to get an adjournment if said prospects are at least realistic. He may further strengthen the case by referring to potential funds from other sources. History is a double edged sword as he has also ultimately always come up with money- but court will decide on what is before it today.If that is the case, and my assumption is correct, then Ron's on even shakier ground.
Should be on iFollowHas anyone got a link to the radio commentary?
Southend or HMRC commentary?Has anyone got a link to the radio commentary?
I should have said, I'm also making the assumption that we're nowhere near a sale, or not close enough to use in court.Not really. The sale alone is enough to get an adjournment if said prospects are at least realistic. He may further strengthen the case by referring to potential funds from other sources. History is a double edged sword as he has also ultimately always come up with money- but court will decide on what is before it today.
Would the NDA preclude any details being allowed to be revealed in court? I assume that it would?I should have said, I'm also making the assumption that we're nowhere near a sale, or not close enough to use in court.
No idea. My guess would be that he'd be OK to say a sale is close, but due to an NDA I can't make it public. I also assume he would have to show any documentation to the judge though, but that wouldn't be made public.Would the NDA preclude any details being allowed to be revealed in court? I assume that it would?
Well I assume that any interested parties will have been advised of this winding up order many weeks ago so hopefully the NDA will have been amended to allow disclosure under such circumstancesNo idea. My guess would be that he'd be OK to say a sale is close, but due to an NDA I can't make it public. I also assume he would have to show any documentation to the judge though, but that wouldn't be made public.
From what I've seen, there were a few cases ahead of us, we should know soonHas it started?
Am sure that I read there was a TTP in place following the previous WUO being dismissed but the payments weren’t being kept up.I'm going to stick my neck on the line here and make a prediction that I desperately hope is wrong. Just after the last hearing and the money paid to HMRC I heard a rumour that TL was negotiating a TTP with HMRC for the remaining money. He was apparently hopeful it would be agreed so the embargo could be lifted in time for KM to sign some players for the run in.
Clearly that didn't happen. So my guess is that the WUP is a result of not agreeing a TTP. My prediction is that Ron is going to argue that HMRC are being unreasonable because whatever SUFC have suggested HMRC have declined. (Who could blame them.) If that is the case then Ron is on very shaky ground.
As I said, I hope I'm putting two and two together and coming up with 23,798,777.0997.
Is that his regular chair?Ron is here. Sat in the row in front. He has already ducked out once with his counsel, probably saw us and got a bit nervous about what can/can't be said in evidence. Several cases still to go before ours - believe we are case 28 out of 50.
@Medway Blue is there I believe. Confirmed that Ron is there and he's ducked out a couple of times with his legal counsel.Are there any Twitter accounts live tweeting the hearing? Assume CP may be and possibly AAS?
My concern also. CP there too, which is not regular.