Andy_S
Member of the Barry Corr Fan Club
We've got Andy Woomer in charge tonight. As it's a name I can't remember off hand I decided to look up his reports on Rate The Ref:
From Bury 1-1 Chester on the 21st August:
"That ref was as bad as they come. I'm sure he didn't mean to be but he was totally biased towards Chester - maybe it was because he was so inexperienced and the Chester bully boys worked on it. Maybe their large vocal support swayed him. But biased he was. Probably as bad a performance as I have seen from a referee and that is saying something.
He put the top hat on his performance when he failed to send off their centre forward after he had flattened our keeper in the latest challenge ever seen. Oh dear............"
"Books one player for a fifty fifty challenge. ONLY books another player for an extremely high, dangerous lunge on the goalkeeper.
Did not apply the booking for over celebrating rule (which in an ideal world would not exist ) BUT last week Bury were penalised for this "offence". Where is the consistency ?"
"All we ask for in a referee is 1) consistency and 2) that we don't notice him and his decisions. I'm afraid that today, Mr. Woolmer was wholly inconsistent in his application of the rules and unfortunately we noticed him far far too much. I'm wondering also whether there is a minimum height rule for referees, this particular chap seemed to have a big attitude problem with some of taller players, except of course Chester's centre-forward who must have smiled very nicely at him...just after he'd clattered Garner the Bury goalkeeper."
From Grimsby 0-1 Rochdale on the 4th September:
"His fitness was good but that's as good as it gets.
Why do the referee's want to be the star of the show with theatrical mannerism's? We had not paid good money to watch him!
Decision making poo and far too petty and inconsistent.
Show off, who had little control and inconsistenly applied the laws"
Should be fun then!
From Bury 1-1 Chester on the 21st August:
"That ref was as bad as they come. I'm sure he didn't mean to be but he was totally biased towards Chester - maybe it was because he was so inexperienced and the Chester bully boys worked on it. Maybe their large vocal support swayed him. But biased he was. Probably as bad a performance as I have seen from a referee and that is saying something.
He put the top hat on his performance when he failed to send off their centre forward after he had flattened our keeper in the latest challenge ever seen. Oh dear............"
"Books one player for a fifty fifty challenge. ONLY books another player for an extremely high, dangerous lunge on the goalkeeper.
Did not apply the booking for over celebrating rule (which in an ideal world would not exist ) BUT last week Bury were penalised for this "offence". Where is the consistency ?"
"All we ask for in a referee is 1) consistency and 2) that we don't notice him and his decisions. I'm afraid that today, Mr. Woolmer was wholly inconsistent in his application of the rules and unfortunately we noticed him far far too much. I'm wondering also whether there is a minimum height rule for referees, this particular chap seemed to have a big attitude problem with some of taller players, except of course Chester's centre-forward who must have smiled very nicely at him...just after he'd clattered Garner the Bury goalkeeper."
From Grimsby 0-1 Rochdale on the 4th September:
"His fitness was good but that's as good as it gets.
Why do the referee's want to be the star of the show with theatrical mannerism's? We had not paid good money to watch him!
Decision making poo and far too petty and inconsistent.
Show off, who had little control and inconsistenly applied the laws"
Should be fun then!