• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Alf Tupper

Guest
Good to see RM taking a tough stance in relation to SW's lawsuit, arguing on the grounds that SUFC did not feel that SW met the obligation of his contract and some of his signings didn't meet that obligation either.

However, I feel the Club could be on sticky ground by saying that a manager should meet the terms of his contract and if
not then should not be paid - why? The following was released by Manchester City this afternoon in relation to a similar problem they have with former manager Joe Royle....

   LONDON, July 6 (Reuters) - Former Manchester City manager Joe Royle has been awarded over 422,000 pounds compensation after a successful claim against the premier league club.
  Royle, now in charge at first division club Ipswich Town, was sacked by City following their relegation from the top flight in 2001.
  He claimed he was entitled to compensation and a judge awarded him a total of 422,819.08 pounds.
  City said they were considering an appeal.
  A statement on their website read: "The result is very disappointing. The judgment is contrary to the firm advice we received from our QC and leading experts.
  "It does not recognise the common understanding of when a club is relegated and we believe produces an unfair result whereby on this basis Mr Royle has received extra reward for failure.
  "We are advised there are grounds for an appeal and will be considering our position over the next few days."

Let's hope RM has not received advice from the same experts!

Before you say the amounts involved are quite a bit different, £25k for SUFC is a lot of money!
 
If RM is trying to sue Wignall for signing the likes of Fullarton and Emberson then surely David Webb must be facing the death penalty for signing Tony Richards?

It's a thorny legal issue.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Mad Cyril @ July 06 2004,16:58)]If RM is trying to sue Wignall for signing the likes of Fullarton and Emberson then surely David Webb must be facing the death penalty for signing Tony Richards?
And Jason Harris ... Dean Holness ... Barrington Belgrave ... Kevin O'Callaghan ...Francisco Cagigao ... Shane Wardley ...

WS
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Mad Cyril @ July 06 2004,16:58)]surely David Webb must be facing the death penalty?

It's a thorny legal issue.
How dare you take the Lords name in Vain
wow.gif
 
Back
Top