• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Follow up letter to Evening Echo News Editor, Sunday 10 February 2008


Dear Christina Ongley,



Further to my forwarded message herewith, it has been brought to my attention across the Shrimperzone website, that the clubs recent prospectus for the sale of shares carries some minor [but non clarified] reference to the subject.

My understanding is that conditional upon supporters first [1] buying shares, they will be granted options to the "buy" [2] "seat for life" and [3] season card/ticket to enable one to access the seat one "owns".

This seem to represent a triple whammy and one which supporters like myself would like Mr Martin to comment upon and provide fuller information. As is often the case, the devil may be in the detail.

Effectively 3 x charges might arise, where one would suffice.

Every-ones budget could and should be catered for: 1/2/3/4/5 10, 15, 20, 25 year [a] life or perpetual season tickets/cards would surely be a simpler and more cost effective solution to the buyer ?

The advance revenues would surely make financial sense all round, particularly if the price were "fixed" at the outset of purchase - as with ones mortgage.

My concern is that ordinary supporters may be priced out under the existing proposals, by the perceived pre-condition to 1st purchase shares; any the apparent "leasing of a particular seat", and on top then to buy a season ticket.

If it were an all-inclusive arrangement [as with ones holidays] many might be encouraged to take a loan to fund their advance season cards, as any interest incurred would be off-set against protection against entrance price increases over the period. By also repaying singular loans quicker, would potentially give one a "free" period of watching football once the loan had be repaid.

The capital injection from 4 - 8,000 potential supporters to SUFC could be enormous, if pitched at an temptingly attractive price range. For example at say an average of say £1,000 x 8,000 = £8 million - that is a lot of money in any ones language.

Some might only pay 1 year, other 3 or more and I would think the average £1K may be on the low side, so the sky is the limit, if supporters can be given the time to get their finances into order to generate the funds in advance.

Time is crucial, hence the need to air these issues sooner rather than later.



Ian K. Walker [full signature below]
 
Why cant we have the new stadium split up into mini plots of ground the shares could be secured on them and we would all truly own a part of the club.
 
On the whole a good idea.

However, at every opportunity I move my seat to other parts of Roots Hall for the view/atmos etc.

Dash

'The Field of Dreams'
 
Here is copy of my further email to the News Editor of Echo, by way of response to your posting:-


Dear Christina Ongley,



Further to my forwarded message herewith, it has been brought to my attention across the Shrimperzone website, that the clubs recent prospectus for the sale of shares carries some minor [but non clarified] reference to the subject.

My understanding is that conditional upon supporters first [1] buying shares, they will be granted options to the "buy" [2] "seat for life" and [3] season card/ticket to enable one to access the seat one "owns".

This seem to represent a triple whammy and one which supporters like myself would like Mr Martin to comment upon and provide fuller information. As is often the case, the devil may be in the detail.

Effectively 3 x charges might arise, where one would suffice.

Every-ones budget could and should be catered for: 1/2/3/4/5 10, 15, 20, 25 year [a] life or perpetual season tickets/cards would surely be a simpler and more cost effective solution to the buyer ?

The advance revenues would surely make financial sense all round, particularly if the price were "fixed" at the outset of purchase - as with ones mortgage.

My concern is that ordinary supporters may be priced out under the existing proposals, by the perceived pre-condition to 1st purchase shares; any the apparent "leasing of a particular seat", and on top then to buy a season ticket.

If it were an all-inclusive arrangement [as with ones holidays] many might be encouraged to take a loan to fund their advance season cards, as any interest incurred would be off-set against protection against entrance price increases over the period. By also repaying singular loans quicker, would potentially give one a "free" period of watching football once the loan had be repaid.

The capital injection from 4 - 8,000 potential supporters to SUFC could be enormous, if pitched at an temptingly attractive price range. For example at say an average of say £1,000 x 8,000 = £8 million - that is a lot of money in any ones language.

Some might only pay 1 year, other 3 or more and I would think the average £1K may be on the low side, so the sky is the limit, if supporters can be given the time to get their finances into order to generate the funds in advance.

Time is crucial, hence the need to air these issues sooner rather than later.



Ian K. Walker
 
Back
Top